<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>TRCB.com RSS Feed</title><description>"What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who  hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?? asked a senior Israeli security  source. "What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is  nuclear capable?" A senior </description><link>http://www.trcb.com/</link><language>en-Us</language><ttl>60</ttl><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:16:10 EST</lastBuildDate><copyright>Copyright 2012 IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis, TRCB.com All Right Reserved</copyright><item><title>Israelis doubt efficacy of Obama proposal to offer Israel 'nuclear umbrella'</title><link>http://www.trcb.com/news/israel/general/israelis-doubt-efficacy-of-obama-proposal-to-offer-israel-2781.htm</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who  hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?? asked a senior Israeli security  source. "What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is  nuclear capable?"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A senior Bush administration source said that the proposal for an American  nuclear umbrella for Israel was ridiculous and lacked credibility. "Who will  convince the citizen in Kansas that the U.S. needs to get mixed up in a  nuclear war because Haifa was bombed? And what is the point of an American  response, after Israel's cities are destroyed in an Iranian nuclear strike?"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama to offer Israel 'nuclear umbrella' against Iranian nuke attack By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent 11 December 2008 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;U.S. President-elect Barack Obama's administration will offer Israel a  "nuclear umbrella" against the threat of a nuclear attack by Iran, a  well-placed American source said earlier this week. The source, who is close  to the new administration, said the U.S. will declare that an attack on  Israel by Tehran would result in a devastating U.S. nuclear response against  Iran.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But America's nuclear guarantee to Israel could also be interpreted as a  sign the U.S. believes Iran will eventually acquire nuclear arms. Secretary of state-designate Hillary Clinton had raised the idea of a  nuclear guarantee to Israel during her campaign for the Democratic Party's  nomination for the presidency. During a debate with Obama in April, Clinton  said that Israel and Arab countries must be given "deterrent backing." She  added, "Iran must know that an attack on Israel will draw a massive  response."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Clinton also proposed that the American nuclear umbrella be extended to  other countries in the region, like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, if  they agree to relinquish their own nuclear ambitions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;According to the same source, the nuclear guarantee would be backed by a new  and improved Israeli anti-ballistic missile system. The Bush administration  took the first step by deploying an early-warning radar system in the Negev,  which hones the ability to detect Iranian ballistic missiles.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Obama said this week that he would negotiate with Iran and would offer  economic incentives for Tehran to relinquish its nuclear program. He warned  that if Iran refused the deal, he would act to intensify sanctions against  the Islamic Republic.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Granting Israel a nuclear guarantee essentially suggests the U.S. is willing  to come to terms with a nuclear Iran. For its part, Israel opposes any such  development and similar opposition was voiced by officials in the outgoing  Bush administration.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;"What is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who  hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?? asked a senior Israeli security  source. "What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have] when Iran is  nuclear capable?"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The same source noted that the fact that there is talk about the possibility  of a nuclear Iran undermines efforts to prevent Tehran from acquiring such  arms.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A senior Bush administration source said that the proposal for an American  nuclear umbrella for Israel was ridiculous and lacked credibility. "Who will  convince the citizen in Kansas that the U.S. needs to get mixed up in a  nuclear war because Haifa was bombed? And what is the point of an American  response, after Israel's cities are destroyed in an Iranian nuclear strike?"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The current debate is taking place in light of the Military Intelligence  assessment that Iran has passed beyond the point of no return, and has  mastered the technology of uranium enrichment. The decision to proceed  toward the development of nuclear arms is now purely a matter for Iran's  leaders to decide. Intelligence assessments, however, suggest that the  Iranians are trying to first accumulate larger quantities of fissile  material, and this offers a window of opportunity for a last-ditch  diplomatic effort to prevent an Iranian bomb.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:31:59 EST</pubDate><guid>http://www.trcb.com/news/israel/general/israelis-doubt-efficacy-of-obama-proposal-to-offer-israel-2781.htm</guid><source url="http://www.trcb.com/rss/article/israelis-doubt-efficacy-of-obama-proposal-to-offer-israel-2781.xml">TRCB.com</source><category>News Israel / General</category></item></channel></rss>
